一起“脉动”回来

编译 | &

朗读 |

《灵魂永生》附录ESP课（下）

（1971年1月5日星期二）

（休息期间讨论到的题目中有一项牵涉到人类肉体的“永恒”程度。）

在私人课中我曾解释过一些还没有在班上提到过的问题。以下就是我的解释：每一瞬间你似乎都在这个宇宙中存在，但其实不然，因为原子和分子具有一种你们通常感觉不到的脉动特性，所以在你们看来好像一直持续存在着的原子或分子，事实上是一系列你们无法追踪的脉动。

有形有质的东西不会永恒存在。你只是将它感知成连续不断的，你们的感知机制还不具备觉察到这种脉动的能力。我这段话是对这位朋友（指Art.O，他是一位工程师）说的，因为他有物理学方面的知识背景，所以他也许能明白我在说什么。

（Art.O：“用我们的话来说，这些脉动是不是极快？”）

的确是。但在某些特殊情况下，“内我”会放下它通常所依赖的肉体感官而觉察到这些脉动，当这种情况发生时，你们通常会认为自己经历了一段“空白”。

你的意识也以同样的方式起起伏伏，时在时不在，但物质性的自己却始终只把焦点集中在物质实相的片刻里。而因为意识的起伏，你自己的“其他部分”对那些并不聚焦于“物质实相”的时刻是有所记忆的，而这也是你的整个存在的一部分。

这件事还没有听起来的一半复杂。比如说，不管你记不记得你的梦，你的某一部分，在催眠状态能记起你这辈子做过的每一个梦。同样，你的某一部分也记得那些没有聚焦在物质实相的“非时刻”，以及当你的存在全然在实相的另一个维度中的时刻，还有你感知我所谓的“非间隔”的时刻。“非间隔”这个词语是以你们的参考术语而言的，相对于“非时刻”我更喜欢“非间隔”这个词语。

（Art.O：“这个“非间隔”也是此生的一个时刻吗？”）

它的确就在此生；同时，这些“非间隔”也是其他实相维度的时刻。

（Jim H：“这种情形是否可以比做灯塔的闪光？”）

如果你喜欢，当然可以。

（Art O：“我认为这种情形可以比作是‘经过整流后的电磁载波’，我们能有所感觉的间隔就是正波，而你所说的‘非间隔’则是那些负波。）

说得好，这就是我一直针对你来讲这一段话的原因。

（Art O：“除了正负两种脉动之外，还有没有更多的脉动？”）

有的，而全我对所有这些实相都有所知。我说这话并无恶意：你们每个人都有自知之明，也全都知道自己的弱点和缺点，那为什么还要假设你所知的自己是你唯一的自己呢？毫无疑问，你们有时会突然发现自己有些平常没有用过的潜能，有时也会突然领悟到，似乎还有些与自己最深层的存在息息相关的其他实相，还未曾在自己的生命中展现。

（对Art O：）请你好好想一想我所说的有关“非间隔”的深意。

（Jim．H：“对于我们存在的另一面而言，‘非间隔’会不会变成了正间隔？”）

正是，而他们感知不到你们在这儿的存在，因为对他们而言，物质世界又是一个“非间隔”。

（Jim．H：“这会不会就是理解“生生世世都同时存在”和所谓“非时间”的关键呢？）

完全正确。以后我会再告诉你们应该改变对“人生”这个词的观念。这是我第一次对一些相当重要的资料所给的暗示，这个问题不论是在私人课里还是在班上都是第一次。但是请你先想一想当你使用“人生”这个词语时你所指的是什么，并且看看它所涵盖的范围是多么狭窄。

这节课即将结束，但我还有一个小点评。我以前说过：你们将来也不会比现在更“死”。如果你能明白这句话，并且好好去想一想，你就会明白今晚我所说的话背后有什么深意。

（Art O:“那也就是说，我们现在也像我们曾经那样‘活’”，对吗？）

话是对的——只不过在你现在所处的人生中，并没有全神贯注在生命活力的全部潜能上。

（Janice．S：“‘母’（MU）这个大陆曾经存在吗？”）

有。请你记住你的梦，对此我还要再叮咛一句：你不仅应该去记住你的梦，还应该练习在梦做到一半的时候醒来，并且明白自己可以在梦境中操控自如，因为梦是你造出来的，是属于你的，而不是什么强加于你，让你无能为力的东西。

（Janice．S：“我们运用存在的方式就像运用梦一样吗？”）

我所说的适用于你刚刚说的这句话。在某个范畴内你所谓的“物质实相”是个梦，但从较广义的范畴来说它是一个你创造出来的梦。当你领悟到是你形成了它时，你就进入了你“全我”的记忆里。

而当你领悟到你以同样的方式形成了你生命中的各种事件时，你将学会去掌控你的全部意识，不论它在此生以何面貌出现。经过凡此种种，你也必然能领悟到自己并非无能为力。你还要记住：即使此生只是那个在某个高层次实相中，拥有更广阔意识的你所做的梦，它却仍然是一个经验和实相的层面。

ESP CLASS SESSION:

TUESDAY, JANUARY 5,1971

（One of the subjects discussed at break concerned the degree of “permanence ” of the physical human form.）

In our own sessions I have explained something that I haven’t mentioned in class, and it is this: For every moment of time that you seem to exist in this universe, you do not exist in it. The atoms and molecules have a pulsating nature that you do not usually perceive, so what seems to you to be a continuous atom or molecule is, instead, a series of pulsations that you cannot keep track of.

Physical matter is not permanent. You only perceive it as continuous; your perceptive mechanisms are not equipped to detect the pulsations. Now, I am speaking to our friend over here （Art O., an engineer） because he may perhaps have a comprehension of what I am trying to explain, because of his background.

（Art O.: “Are these pulses extremely fast in our terms?”）

They are indeed. In certain conditions however, the inner self, abandoning its usual reliance upon the physical senses, is aware of these periods that would seem to you to be negations.

Your consciousness fluctuates in the same way. It is here and then it is not here, but the physical self focuses upon only those moments of physical reality. Because consciousness fluctuates however, other portions of your self have memory of those times when it is not focused in “physical reality,” and this is also a portion of your entire existence.

This isn’t half as complicated as it sounds. Whether or not you remember your dreams, for example, a certain portion of you under hypnosis, could remember every dream that you ever had in your life. So a certain portion of you remembers those nonmoments when you are not focused in physical reality, when your existence is in another dimension of actuality entirely and you are perceiving what I will call, in your term of reference, nonintervals. I like the term nonintervals better than nonmoments.

（Art O.: “Is this noninterval a moment of thisexistence? ”）

It is indeed, in this existence; and also these nonintervals are moments in other dimensions of reality.

（Jim H.: “Might this be compared to the rotating light in a lighthouse? ”）

It may, if you like the analogy.

（Art O.: “The analogy I get is of an electromagnetic wave, a carrier wave, and it’s rectified. The intervals are the positive pulses and the nonintervals are the negative pulses. ”）

This is why I was talking to you.

（Art O.: “Are there more than two pulses? ’’）

There are, and the whole self is aware of all of these realities. With no unkindness meant, you all know yourselves and your weaknesses and failures, so why should you suppose that the self you know is the only self that you are? Surely, it has occurred to you that you have abilities you are not using, that other realities connected with your innermost existence aren’t being expressed in the existence you know of.

（To Art）. I want you to think about the implications of what I have said concerning nonintervals.

（Jim H.: “Would a noninterval be a positive interval to another aspect of our existence? ’’）

It is, and they would not perceive your existence here, for to them it would be a noninterval.

（Jim H.: “Could this be the key to the simultaneous existence of all of our lives, the key to nontime? ”）

Yes, indeed. And some evening I will tell you that you should change your conception of the word “lives.” This is the first hint I have given, either in our private sessions or in class, of some rather important material. But think of what you mean when you use the word lives, and see how limited the term is.

I am going to end our session, but I have a comment. I' have said this before: You are as dead now as you will ever be. Now if you understand that remark and think about it, you will understand much that is behind what I have said this evening.

（Art O.: “Then we are as alive now as we have ever been?”）

That is correct — except that in the life in which you are now involved, you are not focusing upon the full potential of your vitality.

（Janice S.: “Was there a continent of Mu? ”）

There was. Now, I tell you to remember your dreams. In your context I will tell you again not only to remember your dreams, but to learn to come awake in the middle of them and realize that you can manipulate within them. You form them. They are yours, not something thrust upon you in which you are powerless.

（Janice S.: “We are using our existence as the dream? ”）

What I have said applies to what you just said. In one context what you call physical reality is a dream, but in a larger context it is a dream that you have created. When you realize that you form it you come into the memory of your whole self.

And when you realize that you form the events of your life in the same way, you will learn to take hold of your entire consciousness in whatever aspect it shows itself in this life. Through all of this you must realize that you are not powerless. Remember, also, that this life is a dimension of experience and reality even if it is, in contrast, a dream in a higher level of reality in which you have your larger consciousness.

怎样在“赛斯说”微信公众号内搜索呢？

最实用秘籍在下面，滑动浏览哦！