关于病毒的真相（下）

此段摘自《个人与群体事件的本质》第六章“控制下的环境，以及正面与负面的集体行为”第八四零节

体内的病毒过着一种彼此合作的社会性生活。它们的影响只有在某种条件下才变得致命。病毒一定是被触发才开始破坏性活动的，而这只在某一时刻才会发生——在当事人主动寻求死亡，或寻求生物上的危机状况时。

在这种情形下，最初的感染永远是情感性与精神性的。社会状况通常被牵涉进来，比如一个人处于贫穷社会环境的较低层时，或其作为社会一员的个人价值被严重削弱时，他就成了表面上的受害者。

正如这样一个社会成员可能会跑偏、发火、走极端、做出反社会的行为一样，以同样的方式，这样一个人也能触发病毒，破坏它们生物性的社会秩序，于是有些病毒立刻变得致命或者失控了。当然，所引起的病就是传染性的了。在某种程度上，这是一种社会病。与其说是一种病毒突然变成破坏性的——虽然它的确变了——不如说是所有病毒参与的整个合作结构变得不安全且受到威胁了。

我告诉过你们病毒会突变。这是常有的事。相信接种能对抗这种危险的疾病似乎是相当科学的——而无疑地，从科学上说接种看起来是有效的：比如，你们这个时代的人现在就不会再被天花折磨。有些文化曾相信疾病是由恶魔引起的。巫医通过某些仪式试图把恶魔从身上赶走——那些方法也是有效的。那个信念系统很牢固而且被广为接受，只有当那些社会与“文明的观点”相遇时，那种信念系统才开始衰退。

不过，如果你们将恶魔称作“负面信念”，那你们已向前跨了一大步。人们继续死于疾病。你们的许多科学措施，包括接种，本身就会“引起”新的疾病。一个接种了天花和小儿麻痹疫苗的病人并没有得到帮助，如果他最终因负面信念死于癌症的话。

我针对病毒所说的也适用于所有的生物生命。病毒是“非常聪明的”——这是指它们对刺激反应迅速。它们对情绪状态也会作出反应。它们是社会性的。它们的生命有长有短，跨度相当大，有一些可能好几个世纪不活动又重新苏醒。它们有广阔的记忆模式，那是生物性的印记。有些病毒可以在几秒钟内繁殖上万倍。在很多方面它们是生物生命的基础，但只有当它们露出“一张致命的脸”时，你才察觉到它们。

你们对一直在保护身体的内在病毒大军并不觉察。寄主与病毒两者相互需要，都是同一个生命周期的一部分。

The viruses in the body have a social, cooperative existence. Their effects become deadly only under certain conditions. The viruses must be triggered into destructive activity, and this happens only at a certain point, when the individual involved is actively seeking either death or a crisis situation biologically.

The initial contagion in such cases is always emotional and mental. Social conditions are usually involved, so that an individual is, say, at the lower end of a poor social environment，a seeming victim of it, or in a situation where his individual value as a social member is severely weakened.

In the same way that a member of such a society can go askew, blow his stack, go overboard, commit antisocial acts, so in the same fashion such a person can instead trigger the viruses, wreck their biological social order, so that some of them suddenly become deadly, or run amok. So of course the resulting diseases are infectious. To that degree they are social diseases. It is not so much that a virus, say, suddenly turns destructive — though it does — as it is that the entire cooperative structure within which all the viruses are involved becomes insecure and threatened.

I told you that viruses mutate. Such is often the case. It seems quite scientific to believe in inoculations against such dangerous diseases — and certainly, scientifically, inoculations seem to work: People in your time right now are not plagued by smallpox, for example. Some cultures have believed that illnesses were caused by demons. Medicine men, through certain ceremonies, would try to rid the body of the demons — and those methods worked also. The belief system was tight and accepted, and it only began to fail when those societies encountered "civilized views."

If you call the demons "negative beliefs," however, then you have, taken strides forward. People continue to die of diseases. Many of your scientific procedures, including inoculations, of themselves "cause" new diseases. It does not help a patient inoculated against smallpox and polio if eventually he dies of cancer as a result of his negative beliefs.

What I have said about viruses applies to all biological life. Viruses are "highly intelligent" — meaning that they react quickly to stimuli. They are responsive to emotional states. They are social. Their scale of life varies considerably, and some can be inactive for centuries, and revive. They have extensive memory patterns, biologically imprinted. Some can multiply in the tens of thousands within seconds. They are in many ways the basis of biological life, but you are aware of them only when they show "a deadly face."

You are not aware of the inner army of viruses within the body that protect it constantly. Host and virus both need each other, and both are part of the same life cycle.

——摘自《个人与群体事件的本质》（The Individual and the Nature of Mass Events）

校译：Laujenny 美编：路客

《赛斯说●第七十九期》

? “赛斯说” （ ）

? “ ”

? ( ) “群共享里有赛斯资料中英文版下载”

赛斯书预言，赛斯说，缘起，实相赛斯书合集